Recognising the warning signs early can help manufacturers address issues before they affect productivity or reliability.
Cooling can account for a significant proportion of the moulding cycle. If cycle times are increasing without an obvious change elsewhere in the process, reduced flow rates, insufficient cooling capacity or unstable temperatures may be contributing. Even a small increase per cycle can significantly reduce output over a full production run.
Consistent mould temperature is essential for repeatable production. Variations in water temperature, pressure or flow can contribute to inconsistent mould conditions, potentially affecting part quality, dimensions and surface finish. Operators may compensate by adjusting processing parameters, but this can mask the underlying cooling problem.
A chiller operating close to maximum capacity for long periods may indicate that production demand has outgrown the original system design. This can become particularly noticeable during warmer conditions or periods of higher output when little spare capacity is available.
Adding or replacing machinery changes the total cooling requirement and can place additional demand on pumps, pipework and temperature control equipment. A system that was correctly sized several years ago may no longer suit today’s production requirements.
Older equipment, inefficient pumps, incorrect system sizing or poor control can increase the energy required to deliver the same cooling performance. Manufacturers may also be missing opportunities to reduce mechanical cooling demand through technologies such as free cooling.
When a chiller reaches the end of its useful life, replacing it with another unit of the same capacity may seem like the simplest option. However, this assumes the original system is still right for the factory.
Before replacing equipment, it is worth reviewing actual cooling demand, flow rates, required temperatures, chiller capacity, pumps, pipework, temperature control and future production plans. Opportunities for free cooling and improved system controls should also be considered.
Looking at the complete cooling process can reveal issues that replacing one piece of equipment may not solve. Increasing chiller capacity, for example, will provide limited benefit if undersized pumps or restricted pipework prevent the required flow from reaching production.
Summit Process Cooling works with plastics manufacturers to assess complete cooling systems and develop solutions around current production requirements, future capacity and energy efficiency.